The strange connection of Charlie Manson and Dale Carnegie

The strange connection of Charlie Manson and Dale Carnegie

The Helter Skelter: An American Myth miniseries was really good. There was lots of great pictures, audio clips, and interviews with people actually present or involved in the different phases of his life.

The most interesting episodes had to be the middle ones that talked about the different pieces that combined to make Manson who he was. His early life was filled with difficult family conditions common to that time. He started with early involvement in petty crimes (especially stealing cars). By all accounts, he was not a smart criminal – he was continually caught from dumb mistakes and was in and out of very rough prisons.

Some of his character was formed during those prison years. He reported being sexually assaulted in prison, and learned that by acting really crazy, he could often avoid assault. People avoided him when he acted truly crazy – and he would use that all his life. He even called it being ‘Crazy Charlie’.

His next major development came from early prison rehabilitation efforts that led him to taking prison classes. He encountered Scientology courses and methods, but really latched on to a course on Dale Carnegie’s How to Win Friends and Influence People. A lot of analysts have noted he regularly took methods right out of Carnegie’s book to build up his charismatic/mystic persona. If you listen to interviews with him, you’ll inevitably hear him using almost every single Carnegie method – just in twisted and extreme ways to get whatever he wants or exude a persona he wants to create.

He tried to be a pimp – but failed at that because he couldn’t keep his women long enough to live the lifestyle he wanted. He did, however, learn how to spot vulnerable women. Female members of his ‘Family’ said he had an uncanny way of immediately knowing what their weaknesses were and what they were looking for. He would woo them by pretending to be those people and saying what they wanted to hear – using more Carnegie methods. He discovered techniques of isolation and charm that would woo vulnerable, confused, and impressionable young women to doing everything he wanted by preaching free love. Even non-Family members noticed and were amazed at his control over the women in his group.

After many stints in prison, he came out during the counter-cultural years. His heavy fundamentalist upbringing meant he could latch on to the rhetorical way of speaking used by many bay area hippie gurus. Many point out his interviews/talks showed he was no philosopher and certainly didn’t speak nearly as well as the gurus in the hippie groups of California. But he picked up the lingo and combined it with the his charismatic persona in a way that worked well. This combined with being able to spot vulnerable young girls was a deadly combo.

His genuine interest in music connected with the hippie movement and helped woo his followers as well. He wasn’t talentless. He had a unique musical style that really meshed with the counter-cultural sound. His lyrics were keyed to the vulnerabilities of his hippie seeking family members. He did do to some recording sessions – and those recordings are still around. His lack of polish, and the inclusion of family members with no musical talent kept those sessions from going anywhere. But his persona and proximity got him connections with big musical hitters in the Hollywood area. He stayed with the Beach Boys who did steal and modify one of his songs.

He then latched on to anti-war and especially race riots that were using very apocalyptic language. We forget people were publically calling for assassination of whites and blacks. There was a real sense of impending doom as riots spread across the country. This feeling of coming apocalypse perfectly fed into language he learned from his Fundamentalist upbringing.

Yet it was all starting to fall apart. As he became convinced of coming race war – something he called helter skelter. He was assured black people would rise up and kill whites and the destruction of cities – so he decided that starting to kill people would set it off and only he and his followers would survive by living out in the desert. He dragged his family into the desert. He paired up with armed biker gangs, taught his family about using weapons, started breaking into people’s houses to move things and eat their food at first, and turned into drug dealing to make money. Then they turned to actual murders and Mason started talking about doing the devil’s work during the killings. He was teaching his family of love to be killers. His personality became harsh, angry, and violent. He started abusing the women and threatening their lives – even while having sex with them. But by then, it was largely too late for them to get out easily. They had already alienated themselves from family, friends, and everyone else. Their little cultic family was all they had. A few finally escaped and started talking.

While the members of the family were on trial and exuding innocence, singing outside the courthouse, and claiming to be innocent victims being railroaded by an unjust modern system. But behind the scenes they were issuing daily death threats. They killed one of the former attorneys and tried to kill one of the members of the family that was going to testify. They tried to track down and frighten people associated with the case by showing up at their homes.

After conviction, they turned 180 degrees to save Manson. They described in horrific detail about how they killed each of their victims – stories that were completely incongruous to the weeks of smiling faces, denials, and talk of peace. These were some of the most cold blooded killings on record. Happily chasing down and stabbing people up to 50 times until dead – even while begging for their lives and unborn child. It left everyone shaken that kids preaching love and acceptance were capable of such utter butchery and inhumanity.

Manson was a product of both his upbringing and perfect intersection with the cultural movements of his time. In another time or place, he likely would have been dismissed as a low-grade criminal crank.

The series also does a great job of pulling the ‘mystical’ aura off Manson. Most damning of all was that they interviewed his former followers who all confirm what he did. His own followers later realized and say clearly he was just exceptionally good at emotional manipulation and using drugs and brainwashing/isolation techniques under the lingo and trappings of the counter-culture movement. A movement itself that was already based on shakey philosophical grounds that later collapsed.

Manson was not smart nor had mystical powers. It shows how blind idealism can very much be subverted and used to control you – especially with those already alienated from society or a grounding in any values. Some say that Steve Jobs did some of these same sorts of things – using idealism and crafted charisma to charm. Even Steve Jobs acknowledges he adopted certain affectations such as staring at people uncomfortably and other techniques.

Microsoft’s new UI – WinUI3

Microsoft’s new UI – WinUI3

WinUI 3 is the recommended native UI framework for building new Windows desktop applications. It brings the Fluent Design System, high-performance rendering, and a powerful XAML-based programming model to both C# and C++ developers.

Delivered as part of the Windows App SDK, WinUI enables you to create modern, polished, and responsive desktop experiences that run on Windows 10, version 1809 (build 17763) and later, including Windows 11.

That’s the promise anyway. You can program in .NET (C#) or C++ with XAML markup to build apps that run across x86, x64, and ARM devices.

While I applaud the effort, one has to wonder the logic. OS lockin to Windows is largely a thing of the past with most apps being web-based. Almost no company wants single-platform solutions. The cases that need a truly native application are very limited – things like games (which don’t need native UIs), and performance/productivity tools that directly access hardware. I worked on one such app for many years, but those kinds of apps are growing fewer and farther between.

What would be more amazing is if such a framework could also sit as a shim under old Win32 and older native/.NET apps and automatically update them to the new look and feel as well as provide this new UI interface. I realize that may not be possible without breaking lots of apps, but it could be amazing for those apps it does work for. Maybe something for Microsoft to think about…

Warning signs of a toxic culture

Warning signs of a toxic culture

Corporate history offers no shortage of cautionary tales—from Enron to WeWork’s early days to Uber’s well-documented cultural crises. Dysfunction at the top eventually undermined performance at scale. Theranos exemplified a culture of secrecy, intimidation, and blind loyalty, where dissent was punished, expertise was ignored, and narrative consistently trumped scientific reality.

Satya Nadella at Microsoft is sometimes used to illustrate the opposite shift—from a combative, arrogant, know-it-all culture to a more open, learning-oriented mindset grounded in humility, curiosity, and collaboration.

So how can you detect a toxic culture? This article suggests you can often spot them by 6 common factors.

  1. Performance is disconnected from rewards – watch for organizations that value “face time” or proximity to senior leaders outweighs actual output.
  2. Leadership is high on charisma, low on integrity – leaders that may be visionary, confident, and persuasive, but they lack consistency, accountability, and moral grounding. They say one thing and do another, they reward loyalty over competence, and tolerate behaviors they claim to oppose.
  3. Psychological safety is low, but politics are high – many organizations claim to value open dialogue and constructive disagreement. In practice, toxic cultures punish dissent and reward conformity. People become reluctant to speak up, challenge ideas, or admit mistakes—not because they lack ideas, but because the perceived cost of doing so is too high. A common political scenario is the “meeting after the meeting”: formal alignment in public, followed by informal dissent in private. This dual system signals not only fear, but also a breakdown in collective accountability, loss of trust, and reduces the quality of decisions.
  4. Busyness is valued more than effectiveness – Long hours, constant meetings, and visible exhaustion are interpreted as signs of commitment, even when they do not translate into meaningful results.
  5. Talent is retained, but not trusted – High performers are hired for their expertise, yet sidelined in decision-making or constrained by excessive control. In these environments, leaders often signal openness, but fail to genuinely listen or incorporate dissenting views. 
  6. There is a significant gap between stated values and actual behavior – Most organizations have a set of stated values, often prominently displayed on websites, walls, or onboarding materials. In toxic cultures these are little more than marketing slogans. The real indication is shown in how conflicts are resolved, how promotions are decided, and how leaders behave under pressure.

If you find your company has started down this path, it will require a lot of work to change it. After all, in a world where talent is the ultimate competitive advantage, culture is not just a backdrop. It is the operating system that determines whether that talent will thrive or be wasted.

Livestreaming the robot revolution

Livestreaming the robot revolution

China’s Agibot is trying to sell their new wheeled robots by replacing a few people on an actual tablet manufacturing line that were doing quality testing. They upped the game by live streaming it for 6 straight days.

This is perhaps in a response to the US firm Figure who released their own video of humanoid robots doing most everyday tasks.

I honestly think in the next 10 years these kinds of robots walking around your home doing chores will be the new high-end status symbol.

We’ve turned living life into content generation

We’ve turned living life into content generation

We’ve worked ourselves to the point we are conditioned to turn every activity in our lives into content.

We are now passive consumers of everything, even human interaction.

Yet getting everything through a screen is isolating and unfulfilling.

That’s why it needs to be addictive, because it can’t compete with the human experience it is trying to replace.

We are, whether we like to admit it or not, social creatures who need to interact with other people.

If there is one spiritual illness for our times, it is the isolation and wasting of our lives online. I say this as a person that spent my entire life working on the latest computer technology. Is this new? No, we’ve been replacing the deepest desires for love of our hearts as long as man has been alive. Money, power, conquest, ownership have always been there. But now, it’s entertainment.

Look at the tracking in your iPhone to see the number of hours per week you spend on your phone/tablet/devices. We justify it as harmless fun, keeping up with the news, and even casual learning. But imagine what you could have done with 4, 8, or even 12 more hours you spent on your phones each week?

Want to find out? Uninstall your social media apps from your phone. Take ‘screenless’ Fridays in which you don’t watch tv, use your phone for browsing in idle moments, or consume media or books on a tablet.

I did this 3 years ago and noticed several remarkable trends:

  1. My mental health improved dramatically. I originally got off apps during Covid when outrage replaced sex as the hallmark clickbait. I disconnected myself from the pipe – and learned how exploring my inner wellbeing and connection with God was far more fulfilling than anything I got out there.
  2. I got bored. Without the time suck, I spent time puttering around my house and neighborhood. I started going more and more to daily mass. I picked up books I hadn’t looked at in years nor finished. I started, and re-started, projects I hadn’t worked on in years. I eventually won some competitions with the little ideas I worked on.
  3. My general health improved. I got bored. I went for a walk. Soon it was every day. I met several wonderful people and several interesting cats that I now pet every time I go by.
  4. I got involved. I started volunteering for causes I believed in at my Church. I made connections with real people and re-connected with my spiritual life. I spent more time talking with God.
  5. I got social. I started going to morning daily mass. All of a sudden I was talking to people more and more every day and connecting with the lives of others.
  6. I got happier.

Challenge yourself to go on a hike, start volunteering, or get involved in a real life hobby. Go GET BORED. You’ll be amazed the people you’ll start meeting when you are bored and start looking out there instead of in a box.

AI-proof text?

AI-proof text?

MOTUS was a game developed that uses optical illusion effects to render – and this method uses it to display text. Individual frames reveal nothing, but when taken at 30fps, the illusion is revealed.

Would be interested to see if adversarial AI model attacks could be made using this method.

Why we still don’t have widespread cloning

Why we still don’t have widespread cloning

Dolly was the first cloned animal – and that was 30 years ago now. So where are all the clones? Here’s a good article that covers the quick state of things.

Firstly, there is huge failure rates. Dolly took 277 attempts for a single birth. The epigenetic reprogramming required for the clone cells is hard and fails often, but has led to new techniques such as using ethical sourced adult induced pluripotent stem cells for drugs and regenerative medicine research.

Breeders have cloned a horse and even had them compete in equestrian sports; but livestock industries are uninterested and still rely on traditional breeding due to costs and failure rates.

China and the United States offer commercial pet cloning for cats and dogs. Barbra Streisand cloned her dog Samantha into two new puppies. But, the personalities of the new clones were different than the original dog. Just because you share DNA doesn’t mean you’ll share personalities – which any parent of identical twins can tell you. Besides epigenetic, environmental, and socialization differences which can be big differentiators, there is the entire basic question science still cannot answer about what really makes a person alive or dead. For those that believe in a soul, cloning and the nature of the soul has also been reviewed (with no conflict to existing Catholic doctrine, but the ethical problems of such a practice are huge).

Researchers in China cloned a rhesus monkey in 2024 due to its physiological similarity to humans. The supposed goal was to speed up drug testing; but raised serious ethical questions due to the low success rate and lack of real-life applications.

Finally, there is bringing back extinct animals. This requires a fully intact genome, a suitable egg cell, and surrogate species. No ancient animals have yet been discovered with fully intact DNA. Even recently extinct animal DNA is usually unavailable. Though there are methods like CRISPR that might combine ancient DNA with gene-editing technologies; or create mammoth-like animals by editing existing elephants.

So, that’s why we don’t have massive cloning going on even though the technology has been around for 30 years.

The last 10 years have been a major global educational decline

The last 10 years have been a major global educational decline

Despite all the supposed enlightened teaching methods and policies, the Economist reports that the data speaks louder than rhetoric. Even before Covid (and Covid definitely had a negative impact on young people) it is clear whatever policies we have been enacting the last 10 years have been failing our kids. This goes beyond Oregon, that despite record spending, has become a special backwards place as some of the worst schools in the country.

This is a global trend. Test scores in many other first world countries shows gloomy trends. For two decades analysts at the OECD, a club of mostly rich countries, have been asking 15-year-olds in dozens of places to sit comparable exams for what is known as the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). In 2018 these tests found that a typical 15-year-old in the OECD countries was no more adept at math, reading, or science than had been the case in the early and mid-2000s. In science and reading, scores had generally risen until 2009 and 2012 respectively, after which they fell back down. In math they largely plateaued.

A lot of Europe is pointing their fingers directly at digital learning and is starting to ban digital learning devices:

Sweden: Dropped compulsory digital tools in preschools, banned tablets for children under two, and invested millions in physical textbooks to reverse declining reading scores.
The Netherlands: Removed phones, smartwatches, and tablets from classrooms, corridors, and cafeterias, with most schools reporting better concentration and behavior.
Denmark: Banned mobile phones and tablets during class hours, returning to physical textbooks after a decade of heavy digital learning.
Spain (Madrid): Planned restrictions to limit computer and tablet use in primary state schools to two hours a week.
Other Nations: Finland and Norway are reintroducing physical books in early education, while France and Italy enforce strict bans or limits on mobile devices.

I suspect it’s a combination of Covid era isolation and social disruption, social media, digital devices, and now provably failing ‘new’ teaching methods.

There’s an amazing preponderance of evidence that social media is causing untold amounts of mental health issues in young folks: anxiety, inability to concentrate or hold attention, and other psychological problems in young people. There’s solid data that now says that learning from digital devices is much worse than simply reading books. Educational methods from 50 years ago are again producing dramatically better results than everything that has come since.