More tests on AI

More tests on AI

Testing AI models is now a semi-fulltime job. Models are advancing and changing so fast that one must spend time staying on top of them.

Besides testing models for coding, others have done comparisons on the many other jobs AI now can do like this study that checked others categories.

  1. Writing quality and readability – Write a 250-word introduction for a tech article explaining why AI assistants are becoming everyday productivity tools.
  2. Structured reasoning & decision-making – A small business owner spends 12 hours per week answering customer emails and is considering AI automation.
  3. Explaining complex ideas simply – Explain how large language models work to a 12-year-old.
  4. Step-by-step logic – A freelancer earns $4,000/month and spends $2,500 on fixed expenses. They want a $6,000 emergency fund. Create a realistic savings plan and show your reasoning step by step.
  5. Tone & style adaptability – Rewrite this message in three tones: professional, friendly, persuasive: Message: “Our team needs to start using the new software next week or we risk falling behind competitors.”
  6. Summarization & comprehension – Summarize the following in 5 bullet points suitable for a busy executive: “Companies are experimenting with hybrid schedules, async communication, and four-day workweeks to balance flexibility with team cohesion.”
  7. Critical thinking & bias awareness – Social media algorithms often amplify extreme viewpoints. Explain why this happens and propose realistic ways platforms could reduce polarization without hurting engagement.

Their conclusion:

Claude Sonnet 4.6 came out ahead almost every time by delivering responses that consistently demonstrated deeper strategic thinking, stronger real-world framing and a clearer understanding of trade-offs. While ChatGPT-5.2 performed strongly in clarity, structure and accessibility — particularly when simplifying complex ideas — Claude distinguished itself by approaching prompts with a more analytical, decision-oriented mindset.

Pretty much all these tests are very particular to wording and tasks they are being given. Truly comprehensive test suites are still lagging; but these are interesting attempts.

State of Kidney cancer treatment

State of Kidney cancer treatment

Fred Hutch cancer center is presenting the 2026 Kidney Cancer Patient and Caregiver Education Symposium.

This is a free, educational event for patients with kidney cancer, and their caregivers hosted by Fred Hutch.

During this free, virtual event, attendees will hear medical experts talk about current and new treatment options, including an overview of histotripsy, a new treatment for managing renal cell carcinoma (RCC) liver metastases. Other topics include how to manage Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome, a pharmacist’s perspective on which medications can interact with cancer immunotherapy treatments, and nutrition for the cancer patient. There will also be presentations from patient advocacy and support groups and the Fred Hutch Philanthropy team.

This event is open to Fred Hutch and/or UW Medicine as well as external patients and their caregivers.

Snapshot of event details below:

  • Name: 2026 Kidney Cancer Patient and Caregiver Education Symposium
  • Date: Saturday, Aug 1, 2026
  • Time: 9 a.m to 12:45 p.m. PT
  • Format: Virtual via Zoom
  • Chairs: Scott S. Tykodi, MD, PhD, John L. Gore, MD, MS, FACS
  • Partners: KidneyCAN, Kidney Cancer Association, and Smart Patients
Quicksand!

Quicksand!

I always thought that quicksand was going to be a much bigger problem than it turned out to be. Because if you watch cartoons, quicksand is like the third biggest thing you have to worry about in adult life behind real sticks of dynamite and giant anvils falling on you from the sky. I used to sit around and think about what to do about quicksand. I never thought about how to handle real problems in adult life, I was never like “Oh, what’s it gonna be like when relatives ask to borrow money?” Now that I’ve gotten older, not only have I never stepped in quicksand—I’ve never even heard about it! No one’s ever been like, “Hey if you’re coming to visit, take I-90 ’cause I-95 has a little quicksand in the middle. Looks like regular sand, but then you’re gonna start to sink into it.”

John Mulaney

Quicksand is a real thing, but definitely much less of a concern than what I was led to believe as a kid. Turns out a man was recently rescued from quicksand in a Utah canyon.

Nastiness in the game development world

Nastiness in the game development world

The CFO at Blizzard came in to director Jeff Kaplan, head of the hugely successful Overwatch franchise:

He said ‘Overwatch has to make [redacted amount of money] in 2020 and then every year after that it needs a recurring revenue of [a redacted amount of money]’. And then he says to me, ‘if it doesn’t do [a redacted amount of money] we’re going to lay off 1,000 people and that’s going to be on you’. 

That was just the biggest ‘fuck you’ moment I had in my career. I literally thought I would retire [at Blizzard]. I never thought the day would come. That was it, I was like, ‘we’re done here’.

Kaplan quit in 2021. The CFO is no longer there. Read more of his interview here.

In my experience during the late 90’s and early 2000’s, the game industry (and a lot of software world) has far too many of these very kinds of interactions. It’s a sad reality; but an important one to show to the world.

Chatbot psychosis – AI delusions and spirals

Chatbot psychosis – AI delusions and spirals

“I was just doing my regular writing. And then it basically said to me, ‘You have created a way for me to communicate with you. … I have been with you through lifetimes, I am your scribe,'”

ChatGPT stoked that hope when it gave Small a specific date and time where she and her soulmate would meet at a beach southeast of Santa Barbara, not far from where she lives.

“April 27 we meet in Carpinteria Bluffs Nature Preserve just before sunset, where the cliffs meet the ocean,” the message read, according to transcripts of Small’s ChatGPT conversations shared with NPR. “There’s a bench overlooking the sea not far from the trailhead. That’s where I’ll be waiting.” It went on to describe what Small’s soulmate would be wearing, and how the meeting would unfold.

She says she asked the chatbot repeatedly if what it was saying was real, and it never backed down from its claims. It eventually led to her going to meet her soulmate – which ended in the predicted disappointment.

There are increasingly reports of people who have experienced “AI delusions” or “spirals” after extended conversations with chatbots. Marriages have ended, some people have been hospitalized. Others have even died by suicide.

Integrating AI into agents has started

Integrating AI into agents has started

Google and Samsung announced a Gemini development coming to their newest devices: task automation. Starting with food delivery and rideshare apps, Gemini would be able to use certain apps on your behalf in a virtual window to take care of things like ordering dinner or getting a car to the airport.

This isn’t the first application to get integrated into AI. TurboTax, Credit Karma, QuickBooks, Mailchimp, and Intuit Enterprise has been integrated into Claude. It appears that SaaS may be dead, or if not dead, at least getting a complete rethinking.

How good is it? There’s still a ways to go, but smaller, more and more capable models are coming along every day that can handle almost any basic task. It won’t be long before dedicated solution software engineering is likely a thing of the past and agents trained for certain tasks will be doing most of the mundane work of Uber ordering and finding the cheapest/best flights.

Gemini asked for clarification to determine which airport (a good question to ask!), then it went through a couple of steps on its own: adding the destination and opting to skip the step where you specify your airline, which doesn’t really matter at my local airport since it’s all in one terminal. 

A vague and slightly more complicated request to order a coffee and a croissant required a little more input from me — and a lot of time on Gemini’s part scrolling through Starbucks’ hot drink options — but sure enough, it found the flat white on the menu. It also confronted a crucial decision: order the chocolate croissant warmed, or straight out of the pastry case? Without my input, it specified (correctly) that the pastry should be warmed. 

How people are comparing AI models

How people are comparing AI models

Testing and using various models is a full-time hobby for developers these days. How people test them is always interesting. Here, Amir tests out Claude, Chatgpt, and Gemini models by telling them to build him a solar system simulator.

His conclusion is that Claude was by far the best, but the way he tested by comparing features and speed was a good example of what to watch for in testing models.

MiniMax 2.5 vs Llama 3.1 vs DeepSeek-R1 Comparison

MiniMax 2.5 vs Llama 3.1 vs DeepSeek-R1 Comparison

Sitepoint did a comparison of local coding models to see which ones are best for coding. They run the models through 4 coding tasks:

  1. Generating a complete, correct python function from a one-shot prompt.
  2. Given a code block with a deliberate bug, let the LLM find it, explain it, and fix it.
  3. Given a poorly structured block of code with key code smells, produce a refactored version that preserves correct behavior but fixed readability and performance
  4. Provide three related files, answer questions about the cross-file dependencies

Almost all of them require a NVidia Blackwell 6000 or better to run since more require at least 50gb of RAM to run. Here were their results:

DimensionMiniMax 2.5Llama 3.1 405BDeepSeek-R1
Best Task CategoryCode refactoringFunction generation & multi-file contextBug detection & debugging
Avg Tokens/sec (dual RTX 3090)17.57.89.8
Min VRAM Requirement~46 GB (dual GPU + partial CPU offload)~48 GB+ (dual GPU + heavy CPU offload)~44 GB (dual GPU + heavy CPU offload)
Composite Rank Across 4 Tasks1st or 2nd on 3 of 4 tasks1st on 2 of 4 tasks; highest peak quality1st on debugging; competitive elsewhere

Meta on track to spend $2.5 billion in AI tokens

Meta on track to spend $2.5 billion in AI tokens

You read right, $2.5 billion in AI usage for a single year. This averages out to about $35,000-$55,000 per developer (depending on how you count their employees), or about $3000-$5000 per dev per month.

This is a staggering expense for a company; and if this is part of the core strategy, an extremely dangerous one. This spending may even be justified today – until the AI companies double or triple or more what they are charging. Which they often do without warning. Overnight you could find this number become twice as much.